A Resolution To Gun ViolenceA true solution to gun violence does NOT lie with regulating regulation-abiding citizens. It should be obvious - even to pea-brained politicians - that the causes of gun violence are criminals.
While it is simple for the federal government to punish the innocent by means of legislation and feel as though they're addressing the problem, elevated legislation targeting regulation-abiding residents could have completely no impact on crimes dedicated by criminals with guns.
"Why not?", chances are you'll ask. It's easy: criminals break the law so it is inconceivable to enact a particular law that may cease criminals from perpetrating crimes. Legal guidelines that merely make it more troublesome for someone to protect themselves or their households solely work to learn the criminal.
If I were a felony, I do know I might goal individuals who weren't likely to, or couldn't, battle back. It is much safer for the prison that means, and so they don't wish to get damage while committing crimes any more than the sufferer needs to get harm throughout a crime. Does not this make sense? So inform me: how does it make any sense handy criminals MORE victims through legislation? It obviously doesn't make sense, nevertheless it's simpler to feel as if you are addressing the problem if you happen to're doing something - even when it's the mistaken thing.
There are two root causes of gun violence that must be addressed, and are primarily ignored since addressing them is difficult. These two points are: 1. ILLEGAL guns, and 2. Criminals.
While screaming about "gun management," it is proponents appear to disregard a really real and true truth: that guns don't, and have by no means, killed ANYONE. It's the PERSON who does the killing. It's the PERSON who made that selection and dedicated the act. The PERSON selected to put that gun in their hand and pull the trigger. The gun is simply an instrument.
And I can hear gun management proponents saying, "However guns make it easier to kill!" I freely admit that guns could make it more convenient to kill a larger number of victims. However in truth, a prison who wants to commit such an act will find a tool. Someone running around the mall with a samurai sword can kill just as many people earlier than police arrive as can somebody with a gun. Someone might drive a car through the mall and kill a bunch of people too. Or just blow them up. There are many methods to perform such a thing, and it is the South Carolina person, not the instrument, who's responsible. We, as a society, want to remember that.
And let's not neglect that we settle for different things into our lives that kill far more people than even unlawful guns - legally prescribed medicine, for example. On average, legally prescribed medicines kill over a hundred,000 individuals per 12 months - second only to coronary heart disease. But no one mentions that, and those deaths are accepted because medicines help thousands and thousands of others. Well, not surprisingly, legally armed citizens, and the police, use guns to thwart or stop many hundreds of crimes every year - crimes that could simply have ended in the victim's death. But the media fails to say that, too.
So what do we do about gun violence?
As beforehand talked about, we need to concentrate on stopping unlawful guns, and criminals who commit violent acts. Even though these are much harder than punishing the harmless, they're the one things that will have a positive impact and help to reduce gun violence.
Stopping unlawful weapons is difficult, since there are various sources for illegal guns. I suspect the principle source of unlawful guns utilized in most avenue crimes is theft from homes and businesses. If that is true, then it could be wise to focus laws on gun safety, reasonably than gun control.
However even more necessary is to deal with criminals - the criminals who steal the guns, then use them to victimize the populace. The answer to this problem is more easy than it may appear on the surface. Nevertheless, our legal system would need to be adapted to those options, and it could also be necessary to address housing a temporarily increased number of prisoners. However, through the use of these options, I firmly consider the number of criminals will ultimately decrease.